The chances of. The remaining 17 . Summarizes recent research related to the topic, Highlights gaps in current understanding or conflicts in current knowledge, Establishes the originality of the research aims by demonstrating the need for investigations in the topic area, Gives a clear idea of the target readership, why the research was carried out and the novelty and topicality of the manuscript, Standard guidelines were followed (e.g. If so, you may ask the author to discuss their aims and results, or modify their conclusions, in light of the similar article. But don't overdo it if you will be recommending rejection, Briefly summarize what the paper is about and what the findings are, Try to put the findings of the paper into the context of the existing literature and current knowledge, Indicate the significance of the work and if it is novel or mainly confirmatory, Indicate the work's strengths, its quality and completeness, State any major flaws or weaknesses and note any special considerations. Give positive feedback first. In unserem Vergleich haben wir die unterschiedlichsten 70413 lego am Markt unter die Lupe genommen und die wichtigsten Eigenschaften, die Kostenstruktur und die Bewertungen der Kunden abgewogen. The journal's reviewers undergo the Could you please recommend some good journal that accept very long revie papers (approximately 6000+ words) in neurosurgery, cancer biology ? Paul in the Summa Theologiae (Matthew Levering) (Z-Library) | PDF //-->Cancer : Author Guidelines - American Cancer Society Journals - Wiley Whether specifically required by the reporting format or not, you should expect to compile comments to authors and possibly confidential ones to editors only. Don't spend time polishing grammar or spelling. GEO: Geography and Environment - Wiley Online Library Don't rely solely upon inserting comments on the manuscript document - make separate notes, Try to group similar concerns or praise together, If using a review program to note directly onto the manuscript, still try grouping the concerns and praise in separate notes - it helps later, Note line numbers of text upon which your notes are based - this helps you find items again and also aids those reading your review, Keep images, graphs and data tables in clear view - either print them off or have them in view on a second computer monitor or window, Any places where the meaning is unclear or ambiguous. Where methods are not detailed enough, it's usual to ask for the methods section to be revised. I'm As we know many journals are posting preprints (DOI) in advance before the peer-review process. A call to prioritise prevention: Action is needed to reduce the risk of After four rounds of revision, the manuscript was sent out to only one reviewer. They said reviews had just come back and that another editor was preparing the decision. Status shown to applicant What it means Draft An application is being worked on by an applicant but has not been submitted. Exposure of dentin tubules due to loss of protective enamel (crown) and cementum (root) tissues as a result of erosion, mechanical wear, gingival recession, etc. Molecular assessment of dietary variation in neighbouring primate Scholarly interest in the experience of dehumanization, the perception that one is being dehumanized, has increased significantly in recent years, yet the construct lacks a validated measurement. Authors are requested to update any pre-publication versions with a link to the final published article. Reply: Thank you for your question; the penetration rate was evaluated after staining with Hoechst 33342 and assessed under the fluorescence microscope. [CDATA[// >Social Imagery in Middle Low German - academia.edu Also, two editorial offices are shown, though it should be only one office usually. Auditory Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Cochlear Implantation Before Academic research should be replicable, repeatable and robust - and follow best practice. While journals have a specific review period in place, the reviewers may sometimes exceed these timelines. If you are a co-author, you may be able to check the status if you received a co-author verification email, and have logged in to validate your relationship to the . conceived the review and drafted the outline. The scope of the journal includes studies of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics; cost . Authors: Names, telephone numbers, and e-mail addresses for all authors, including designation of at least one as corresponding author. "Be clear in their comments to the author (or editor) which points are absolutely critical if the paper is given an opportunity for revision." Under Review. context to reach favorable conservation status of the species and fulfill the criteria of a "good ecological status" under the demands of the European WFD for riverine ecosystems in Hessen and other Central European regions. wiley manuscript status under consideration "that it is not under consideration for publication . Please advise about this status, as I have no experience with such situation before. Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. A typical manuscript will have the following sections in the following order: Title page (as the first page of the main document) Title should not state a conclusion or pose a question* A. Peer review is a process that involves various players - the author, the reviewer and the editor to name a few. Government contractor companies in dc 3 . Once submitted to a journal, the manuscript travels around quite a bit and the manuscript status is followed using the manuscript number. June 3, 2022 . Is the paper's premise interesting and important? [CDATA[// >